MDF Financial Services is no longer accepting new clients
Posted by Marcelo in Uncategorized on February 12th, 2010
In response to the ever changing in the regulatory and licensing environment, MDF Financial services has voluntarily decided to discontinue accepting new clients. Thank you to all of our visitors.
If you have any questions about a file already in processing with us, please email processing@mdffinancialservices.com
The Economy, Family, and Relationships
Posted by Marcela in The Crisis of Credit on June 16th, 2009

Hard times can really bring out the best in a person. Or the worst.
It is part of my job to read hardship letters written by my clients. I have seen and heard of both extremes. From men whose wives leave them for a man who does have a job after months of nagging to couples who end up living in a van with their three children. An economic downturn can destroy a family, or it can turn a family into something so solid that when the good times finally do come, their respect and appreciation for each other brings happiness on a daily basis.
Have you ever met a couple that has been together since the Great Depression? Some of the couples I’ve met are inseparable. They have stuck together through thick and thin and their relationship has been the very glue that made the tough economic times bearable. These people have had each other for decades, could depend on each other for richer or for poorer, til death do they part. They raised children together instilling the value of the dollar and a hard days’ work. The woman never demanded a huge diamond ring and the husband could trust his wife with her name on his life savings. The hard times would eventually pass and slowly they would rebuild and expand until the very economy that tried to destroy them made them into the pillars of their family tree.
One of the first things that a family learns when things get tight is how much they are willing to sacrifice for one another. Many people are now learning that a board game and a home cooked meal with their loved ones can be the perfect Saturday night. When your teenage daughter can’t go out on a Friday with her friends because money is too tight yet you see that same beautiful girl laughing with her Daddy like she did when she was three, that is pure joy. One of the things that many people lose first when they gain financial security is their ability to understand love for love’s sake. It sometimes seems so much easier to buy the affection of those around you that you avoid any other form of expression. When the funds are gone, all of a sudden a person can realize what is really important.
Not all relationships turn out that way. The other side of the coin is the despair of a person unable to make his or her mortgage payments, and the marriage crumbling as a result. My mother had an old saying; “When poverty comes through the door, love flies out the window.” Sadly, in many cases, this is the truth. My parents had a turbulent marriage followed by financial disagreements and family illnesses. They were not unique in this, it is amazing the toll that these troubled times is taking on today’s families. When Mommy or Daddy can’t find a job, it may mean more than losing a house or having the power shut off. It may very well shred the very fabric of the family. While in some families hard times bring them closer, in others it bring out a level of selfishness that one may never have imagined. This is not to say that failed marriages are the product of people who cannot love. Sometimes the only real problem is communication. When two people are desperate and anxious and unable to express this with each other it becomes really difficult to keep a relationship going.
Another trend in relationships that stems from rough economic times is the drop in divorce rates, not due to happy healthy marriages ‘working it out’ but simply because it’s cheaper to just stay together. Remember that a divorce makes one home into two households, and if the couple cannot make ends meet as a unified front most likely they certainly can’t afford to live separately. This behavior sends very confusing signals to any children of the union. The example they are given of a married couple is of one that is internally flawed and lacking in passion. Arguments abound and lack of mutual respect become what the children consider the norm and may affect their ability to have healthy relationships of their own.
My basis for writing this article is a spinoff of The Human Toll of Foreclosure on Zillow.com. It is really easy to give in to your desparation and sadness when money is tight and you feel like the world is ending. But at the end of the day it is vital to take inventory of what is REALLY important in your life.. and you will find that your bank account is probably NOT number one on that list.
How the Pay-Option ARM Destroyed Lives.
Posted by Marcelo in Loan Modifications, The Crisis of Credit on June 11th, 2009
Imagine you were thinking of buying a home. Based on your income of $5000 monthly you may have calculated that you can afford $1600 per month and you went to LendingTree.com and saw that at todays rate you could buy a home for $210,000. Then you went to a mortgage broker and found out that this genius has a way for you to buy a home for $450,000 in a much better neighborhood with a pool and cobblestone driveways for THE SAME PAYMENT. You went for it, of course. What you were never told was that you were not really paying the mortgage every month, but borrowing from the bank every month so that you could afford to live there. This isn’t imaginary though, there are many people in this situation and they are about to lose thier homes.
The animal we are speaking about is the Pay-Option ARM. This is an adjustable rate mortgage where the borrower is given the option of paying principle and interest, interest only, or just the index (what it costs the bank to lend to you without profit.) In many cases, this index was as low as 1%. As you can imagine the payment is very low. (There are many types of pay-option ARMS, this is just an example but pretty standard.) The difference between what the true rate is and the minimum payment is put back onto the loan. In the case above, every month the borrower would pay the 1% at $1600 but every month $1800 was put right back into the loan. Once the loan amount reaches anywhere from 115%-125% of the original amount, or about $525,000 (about 40 payments) the lender takes away the ability to pay anything but the full principle and interest payments. So after about 3 years of living in a $450,000 home. The buyer’s payments go from $1600 to $3400 overnight. At a steady $5000 per month, this buyer is headed to foreclosure and owes $75,000 more than the original loan amount so has no equity to sell.
This is not a purely evil product, however. It actually has a use. It can be used by the self-employed who would like the option of borrowing from thier home to use for investing in a business. When they get a little return, they pay down the loan so that it never reaches the 115% mark. Investors can be creative to make this work for them in many ways. Unfortunately the brokers got a hold of it and ruined it. See, it was a favorite amongst brokers not only because it was an easy sell, but because they could hide the real rate from the borrower, allowing them to jack it up as high as the bank would allow and collect a huge payout from the bank behind the scenes. They would do everything possible to make sure the borrower only ever saw or knew aboutthe 1% rate and payment. At closing the broker would wear a red cape and tights as they proudly showed what a Super-Broker can do. This product was never intended to put people in loans they could not afford. That is exactly what it was used for.
Take the case of a current client of ours. We will only call him G.L. G.L. is a widower. He lost his wife in a bout with cancer several years ago. All he was left with was $100K in medical bills, a special needs child, and his home. He received a letter in the mail one day from a mortgage broker stating that she knew of a way that she could help him clear up his medical bills. She could get him a mortgage that would roll the bills into the equity in the home and – get this- make his payment go down. G.L. wanted to take care of his bills rather than declare bankruptcy and was awe-struck that this guardian angel had come along. See G.L. was on disability and was only making barely enough to pay his mortgage as it was. How could it be possible that he could take care of this looming problem and get a lower payment? It was a pay-option ARM. Today, three years later, his payment is about to go up to more than he earns monthly and he is about to be homeless. The broker paid herself a handsome commision from the bank for giving him a high rate.
Fortunately for G.L. We are going to be able to get his loan modified and he may be ok after all of it. I can tell you that G.L. was in a terrible spot with quite a bit of stress and didn’t know where to turn. If the banks were not pressed to modify by the governement inititaitives and private efforts then it may have been a very sad and different story. However, everyone here lost, except for the broker. While there are stories of homeowners who took out lots of cash on these pay-option ARMs and now can’t explain where the cash went as they lose thier homes, I assure you G.L. does exist and there are others like them. there may be no real solution for most of them.
By the way, I feel ok in doing this. The broker that gave G.L. his mortgage was H.S. at Homefront Mortgage in Las Vegas Nevada. Not that it matters much. This is the CEO of Homefront mortgage today after the banks pulled the plug on thier scheme:

How Exactly is a FICO Score Calculated?
Posted by Marcela in Uncategorized on June 10th, 2009

In the past, people did not worry about their credit as much as they do today. Before the crisis of credit fell upon us, threatening to drown many of us in a sea of uncertainty, the worst that could happen to you if you had bad credit was that your interest rate was very high. Perhaps you would end up in an adjustable rate or with a loan based on the stock market. But those days are done.
The new word is ‘no’. There are no ’special’ programs or exceptions, no options or promises. If you have bad credit, the answer is no. Ironically, if you have good credit however, your opportunities are more amazing than ever before. Interest rates are at an all time low, and the values of homes are so depreciated that you can snag yourself an amazing deal on your dream home. As long as you have a hefty down payment, patience, and a 700 credit score.
But who on earth has this beautiful credit score? And HOW? The answer is elusive, because the Fair Isaac Corporation wants it that way. I spent countless hours trying to unravel this mystery, and I came up with a couple of answers that many may find informative and beneficial. Most of this information comes directly from MyFico.com.
The most important piece of the pie is your payment history. For this reason, a late payment on major loan such as your home can make your score sink like the Titanic. It is important to attempt to have late payments removed from your credit history any way possible. Being consistently late on your mortgage payment can have your FICO drowning in the 500s in no time.
What you can do: Always be on time. If you know you will be paying late for any reason, contact the company and inform them so that they push back your due date or make an exception prior to actually being late. There are lenders that will allow you to pay late as long as you inform them in a timely manner. Another great way to raise your credit score is to keep a minimum balance and pay every month on time. Even if the monthly payment is only $10, paying on time every time raises your score exponentially as the account ages. In this way you are both benefiting your payment history and your credit history length.
Amounts owed is the next most important slice. Ideally, you owe only 20-30% maximum of total credit available. If you have a $1000 credit card, try to keep your balance below $300. Pay your minimum so that your score reflects consistancy. A big mistake a lot of consumers make is to close credit cards that are paid in full. Keeping cards with a zero balance open benefits you in two ways: it raises your credit available by lowering your amount owed versus available, and it helps you in credit history length as aforementioned.
Fifteen percent of your score is the length. The longer you have the same credit card the better. An American Express card that is fifteen years old and always current is like money in the bank. It shows lenders that you are responsible, trustworthy and accountable. Credit history of this length basically advertises your loyalty.
The type of credit used accounts for 10%. Types of credit include credit cards, retail accounts, installment loans, mortgage, consumer finance accounts, etc. Obviously a mortgage is calculated differently from a credit card. A mortgage cannot be considered for availability because of the way that a note is structured. Credit card balances fluctuate and are scored based on percentages, while a mortgage is based on on-time payments and length in years.
New credit is the last factor. The number of recently opened accounts the percentage of accounts that have been recently opened, by type of account, makes a big difference in your score. For example, someone who opens 5 credit cards at one time has a lower score than someone who already had 4 credit cards for many years and opens one new one. Also taken into consideration is the number of recent credit inquiries. Every time someone checks your credit with the purpose of attempting to issue you more credit it is reported on your profile and affects your score. The time since a recent account was opened or a credit inquiry was made also affects your credit slightly. Re-establishment of positive credit history following past payment problems becomes more and more relevant as the time goes by that you are current.
Education is the key to keeping a healthy credit report. No one factor determines your score, rather it is a culmination different factors that create an overall profile of you as a borrower. The scores are kept on a case by case basis and two people with very similar situations may have a drastic difference based on one or two items. One exception to the rule I have noticed, however, is married couples. Even though two unmarried people with identical credit overviews may have varying scores, with married couples there is usually very little difference.
Whether people realize it or not, their credit score affects every facet of their lives. Most likely, when you awake in the morning, you are in a mortgaged home. You take a shower and then drive your financed car to a job that may or may not have checked your credit prior to hiring you. After work you go to the grocery store and shop based on a budget calculated by how much money you have left after paying your mortgage, which depending on your interest rate determines how much cash you have. If you have a grown child in college with student loans, an equity line of credit or a credit card that you still owe $8000 to after that vacation last summer, you probably know exactly how much interest you pay on each of those accounts. You also know that your score has determined that rate.
The days of free credit for everyone are gone. We are actually back tracking to a time when people spent their entire lives nurturing their FICO score until that fateful day when they would buy their first home on a conventional fixed rate 30 year loan. There were no adjustable rates or sub-prime mortgages, it was good credit or continue renting. Perhaps it had seemed as though we had ‘evolved’ beyond demanding that only responsible, educated consumers get to buy homes on credit. But apperantly, that evolution has cost us financial stability as a nation. And perhaps the only way we will be able to crawl out of this mess is to learn from our predecessors, and start seeing credit as a responsibility, not a right. And if you need help making your credit score into something you live with, then give me a call.
Foreclosures at a Record High…And No One Can Say Why?
Posted by Marcela in Uncategorized on June 8th, 2009

As I was pursuing through some real estate news I became fascinated with the following phrase:
‘despite the efforts on the part of [insert institution here]…..’
And while my morbid fascinated is rarely sparked by such generic phrases, this particular one had me at a ‘duh’ moment.
I’ll tell you why. It doesn’t matter if Obama issues military-backed orders to all lending institutions in America and holds up Bank of America at knife point. It doesn’t matter if the banks bend over backward to send out overnight modifications to every home in the country. It doesn’t matter if a consumer stays on the phone day and night with the bank faxing and printing and obtaining. None of this matters.
The bottom line is many people simply DON’T HAVE MONEY! Even with a perfect loan workout and a 2% rate and stretching the loan to 40 years there are millions of Americans who are unemployed and simply cannot AFFORD their homes. So in my opinion, the question should not be WHY there are so many foreclosures but rather why the banks are not working harder to identify which borrowers CAN afford to stay in their homes? With the foreclosures actually dragging house values down, it is surprising to hear that banks will not workout many clients because they ‘make too much money’. The individuals who have decided that renting would be cheaper than staying in their devalued homes have chosen to walk away rather than continue to pay. Further destroying property values and adding even more fuel to the unemployment fire. Before this turns into a tirade, I’d just like to say that I don’t have the cure for our dilemma, but I do have a suggestion.
Expand loss mitigation departments. That’s it.
This may seem like a no brainer. Take all the people OUT of the ‘New Loan’ department and train them to modify. The banks had no problem calculating how many employees they needed to SELL loans, how difficult can it be to figure out how many people are needed to service the ones you have? You need people to answer the phone and punch in the consumer info. You need people in charge of mailing out applications for modification. People can be given the task of looking over documentation all day long and deciding who qualifies, not by some nit-picky system but in order of benefit to the economy. You need finance people to figure out the new terms, lawyers to write up documents, well you get the picture.
How people can sit around writing articles and speculate about why is beyond me. The ‘why” is clear- we are in this mess because credit lost its respect. In the past, people were responsible with credit because if they were not, they wouldn’t have any. As time went on and even 10 year olds could receive a credit card in the mail, everyone went nuts and started living way above their means using credit as their crutch. Loans were originated that should have never been signed and now we are all paying the price. So rather than focus on why, perhaps we should concentrate on how it can be fixed.
Eventually, the market will regulate itself. People with savings will purchase themselves a foreclosure and investors will do the same. Some neighborhoods will fall into disrepair and become abandoned. Many families will see hard times like they have never seen even in their worst nightmares. We have been through this before, and it will happen again, only this time we have cars and computers. The markets will shift, and slowly industry will begin to reform here rather than be outsourced overseas. In the meantime, what can a consumer do to avoid being one of the faceless masses on the brink of foreclosure? Diligence is key. Contact your bank over and over. If it gets tedious or frustrating, hire someone to harass them for you. And never, ever wonder ‘why’ again. Just focus on how it can be fixed, losing sleep over reasons is a waste of perfectly good sleep.
Angelo Mozilo and Loansafe.org may have much in common
Posted by Marcelo in Loan Modifications on June 5th, 2009

What is it about the lending industry that attracts such unsavory folk? We all know about the loan shark and how once they manage to lend you some money, you either pay them or get your legs broken. However, even in a nationally regulated environment, the mortgage industry seems to produce employees that have no virtue above lining thier pockets. See the case of Angelo Mozilo and Countrywide.
The SEC is finally charging Mozilo and his 2 highest executives for fraud. Angelo Mozilo started Countrywide with a partner in the late 60’s doing primarily FHA and VA mortgages. They built a reputation for safe lending and strict underwriting over the following 30 years and became quite rich doing so. After the death of his partner, Mozilo took over the helm of Countrywide and made the name synonymous with teaser, adjustable rate, and subprime. Profits soared as Countrywide was using its good name to peddle subprime as prime to investors. After all, who cared? Once the loan was sold, it would sit in a mortgage pool and may or may not default. Countrywide made its profit. The perfect pyramid scheme.
Well, this is could not continue for long, as eventually these loans would start to default. This was not before Mozilo started dumping all of his stock, which is what interests the SEC most. If Mozilo knew he was running Countrywide into the ground, why did he continue? He knew these loans would default and still wrote them. What is the definition of a predatory lender? I don’t think anyone in all of history has known a predatory lender of this size and it wasn’t just the borrowers who suffered, it was Wall Street, and eventually Main Street as well.
Mozilo earned the trust of borrowers and investors alike and used that to eventually assure his financial security for generations to come. “If Countrywide was around for 40 years making safe mortgages, then this adjustable rate with a 1% teaser must be safe for me,” borrowers thought to themselves at closing. Countrywide entered into the homes of hard working Americans as a wolf in sheep’s clothing. This seems to be the common theme among those that are churning the lending industry for profit.
Let’s not blame Mozila for the whole credit crisis. There is plenty of blame to go around. Take the example of Loansafe.org. This web site portrays itself as a non-profit forum for borrowers to exchange information and learn a little about the how to modify a loan. Well, to an industry insider it was obviously nothing but a store front for a loan modification company and was a never registered as a non-profit. However, this web site became the industry standard for information on loan modifications. The owner has been known to block the IP address of real loss mitigation professionals and censor any posts that did not show his company in the best of light as well as allow posts berating other companies. This is not a forum but a huge elaborate commercial, and while there is nothing wrong with advertising, it shows the lack of honesty and transparency that plagues the lending industry that he proports to fight against.
Also at hand is the approach taken by the owners. Many of the early posts on the forum were not much more than angry flails at the banking industry and how they are purposely screwing the American people just for the fun of it. This doesn’t help and it isn’t that simple. Even the web sites motto, “Pay it Forward” is baseless. I remember an early post was made by a mortgage broker who was picking the moderator’s brain on how to help his former clients. As soon as the moderator learned that this was a broker and not a potential client he offered no more information. Instead he said, “Pay it forward, and then maybe I will give you some information.” I am not sure he knows what “Pay it Forward” means, but it does makes him sound like a good person… The owner of the trademark is now asking for the Loansafe name back because the name was never supposed to be used to advertise a product.
This whole industry lacks transparency. A company that advertises its services should state that they work for profit. This is how business works. Either you pay or you don’t. And the company needs to answer in justification of their fees. The way this industry tries to hide its true identities has allowed too many wolves to run the show. It is time that the responsible professionals in this industry finaly stand up, and help throw a few liferafts in the general direction of the suffering American public.
FICO and Loan Modifications
Posted by Marcelo in Loan Modifications, The Crisis of Credit on June 1st, 2009

Navigating the road to a loan modification
This topic appears to be one of the hottest topics surrounding loan modifications. Now that people understand the government programs, have a better idea of who qualifies, and now want to pursue one, we want to know the long term repercussions of obtaining one. Namely, we want to know how a loan modification will affect credit scores. Let’s start with definitions. The main concern we have is FICO. This is the company responsible for putting a number on the credit report (Ranged 300-850.) The individual bureaus are only responsible for gathering the data that is used to calculate the score. Variations in data lead to variations in score. To make matters more complicated, FICO uses a different calculation when showing the number to a mortgage company, consumer, or any other credit application type. This number is supposed to give a potential creditor an idea of the likelihood that any credit extended to this consumer will be repaid in a timely fashion.
Now Fair Isaac Corp., the company that invents and maintains FICO is a private company. They are very secretive about the algorithms and calculations used, but they do reveal some items. See, if a lender decides to report a mortgage modification to the credit bureau, it will show up, but the hit to credit score is very minor and from all we have seen can be negligible. The dropping of score really occurs from factors we may not have considered. One of the heaviest weights on FICO is total loan balance to original Credit offered. The healthiest percentage is at about 20-35% balance. Anything less than or above that drags down score. In most modifications there is an adjustment to loan balance when any past due is capitalized onto the loan. Another factor that may drag score down is if the term of the loan is lengthened. Longer term limits hurt score. Finally, the most obvious item is any mortgage lates will drop score significantly, especially when the credit is pulled by a mortgage lender.
If you are pursuing a loan modification, you are probably trying to get your finances in order. Most likely you cannot currently afford your mortgage and have not been able to pay down debt the way you could at one time. Chances are your borrowing power has been diminished solely based on debt ratios regardless of score. A loan modification is changing the original terms of the loan in a way that favors the borrower. The point is, if you have a 750 credit score and are concerned about maintaining it, you are most likely not a great candidate for a loan modification. While it is admirable to want to maintain high credit scores you should be more concerned with keeping a roof over your head. In short, a loan modification will help you restore proper debt ratios and get your finances in order so that you will be in a better position to maintain your credit. Don’t let the short term effects of the changes concern you. FICO will work itself out if you attain a good loan modification.
For more information, Please contact MDF Financial Services.
Help! I’m In Foreclosure! What Happens Now?
Posted by Marcela in The Crisis of Credit on May 28th, 2009

Welcome back to class boys and girls. Today’s lecture I am calling Mortgage Default 101.
Mr. Smith has lost his job. He will be case A. He used to earn 60k a year and has an $1800 mortgage. He applied for unemployment but he still cannot feed his wife, 2.5 children, and dog while paying the mortgage. So he falls behind, assuming when he finds new employment, he will catch up. The problem is that once he became 90 days delinquent on his mortgage, the bank stopped accepting payment and began the process of foreclosure.
Case B: Mr. Jones can afford his primary home. He makes enough money in his field to pay his mortgage, on his home. When the economy was good, Mr. Jones bought two rental properties, plopped some families inside them, and collected rental income to supplement his salary. Unfortunately, once the housing market crashed, the tenants could no longer afford the exorbitant prices around the rental’s neighborhood, so they left and now Mr. Jones is stuck with empty underwater properties. He has since stopped paying the mortgages on those properties and is now in foreclosure.
Miss Snow is a teacher and although she didn’t lose her job, she did receive a hefty pay cut. She is current but it is getting harder and harder every month to make ends meet. Her mortgage is $1100 and her pay has been cut to $25,000/year. She is case C.
Mr. Big is current on all 15 of his investment properties but he wants to get rid of the ones that are causing him the most profit loss. He’s case D.
Having accepted that they will not be able to afford their homes if the situation continues, these brave souls embark upon an epic journey through the frigid waters the financial housing meltdown.
The first route everyone considers is loan modification. Of the four case studies I have just presented, guess how many of them even have a tiny little shot in HELL of ever getting one through the home affordable program? That’s right class, Miss Snow. She fits into some of the main qualifications, the home is her primary residence, she has verifiable income, her home is worth less than 700k. If her loan is owned by FreddieMac or FannieMae, she’s good to go. The only problem is that while she has to ride her white horse through the Valley of Lost Applications before she can reach the beautiful Kingdom of Affordable Payments. Her bank will have her on hold, tell her she doesn’t qualify, misplace her paperwork, etc. However armed with her diligence and an enchanted sword, she finally reaches her destination. Obtaining a Loan Modification is a difficult, tedious task so think of us as your enchanted sword
.
For those who never made it to the Kingdom of Affordable Payments, the were three possible creatures that thwarted them. The fastest way to end foreclosure proceedings is called a Deed-in-Lieu of foreclosure. This basically means that you hand over the deed to the bank and say ‘It’s been great, see ya!’. Mr. Big, our investor, has fallen at the grips of this particular monster. He is taking a 150 point hit on his credit score, however he negotiated with the bank so that they would agree not to seek a ‘deficiency judgment . A deficiency judgment is a court order making the borrower financially responsible for the bank’s loss.’
There are 4 main conditions for a lender to consider a deed-in-lieu.
1. Foreclosure is imminent and unavoidable
2. The borrower is unable to sell the property.
3. There should be no other liens, or attachments to the property.
4. The property needs to be left in broom clean condition.
If those conditions have been, or can be met, some lenders will consider a deed in lieu of foreclosure, although most lenders will prefer the use of a compromise, or short sale. This is one of the least preferred alternatives to foreclosure and should be the last option explored.
The next pitfall is the ”Short Sale’, the weapon(I mean option) that the bank would rather use This is basically when you come to an agreement with the bank to sell the home for less than what is worth. This one sucks because all of a sudden the property is a madhouse with appraisers, photographers, and possible buyers. In a short sale, the bank or mortgage lender agrees to discount a loan balance due to an economic or financial hardship on the part of the mortgagor. This negotiation is all done through communication with a bank’s loss mitigation or workout department. The home owner/debtor sells the mortgaged property for less than the outstanding balance of the loan, and turns over the proceeds of the sale to the lender, sometimes (but not always) in full satisfaction of the debt. In such instances, the lender would have the right to approve or disapprove of a proposed sale. Extenuating circumstances influence whether or not banks will discount a loan balance. These circumstances are usually related to the current real estate market and the borrower’s financial situation. The credit hit is bad, but certainly not as bad as a foreclosure. This is what Mr. Jones succumbed to, luckily he didn’t have to live in the properties while the bank attempted to sell them.
I’d like to say the Mr. Smith found a new job and everything went hunky-dory after that. Unfortunately, no. He fell victim to most heinous of the Valley’s monsters, foreclosure. He took a huge hit on his credit and now he and his family live with his mom, who fortunately, has empty bedrooms in her house.
For a FABULOUS Article on how these three evil villains affect your credit, CLICK HERE
For more information on me and my company, click HERE
Transformers: American Failure in Disguise
Posted by Marcela in Uncategorized on May 18th, 2009

The big three are in big trouble. As I was trying to figure out what my article today would be about my mind started drifting to my awesome weekend. I took my kids to a museum and I bought my son a new Transformers blanket and pillow, which he adores. My boyfriend had never seen the Transformers movie so I made him sit through it. He went on a tangent making fun of Chevy for having helped to finance the movie. Every car in that movie is a GM, and the way it is looking, a couple of years from now it will be considered a history flick. One day our children will be watching this on a screen in class and marvel at the self-importance that this company exhibits.
I decided to break down the auto crisis into one long article for everyone to be able to understand, at a glance, what is going on. Let’s look at the ‘Big Three’ on a case by case basis.
Statistics

Employees: 20,000 Vehicles sold, 2008: 1.9 million Dealers: about 4300
Major U.S. brands: Ford, Murcury, Lincoln
DETROIT (AP) — Ford Motor (F) said Tuesday it plans to trim its number of dealerships in 18 metropolitan areas across the country, blaming sliding car and truck sales for the decision.

Employees: 54,000 Vehicles sold, 2008: 2.01 million Dealers: About 3,200
Major U.S. brands: Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep
Chrysler, operating in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, tagged nearly 800 of its dealerships for termination.
Employees: 244,500 Vehicles sold, 2008: 8.35 million Dealers: 6,000
Major U.S. brands: Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC, HUMMER, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn
General Motors (GM), facing a White House-imposed deadline to restructure or file for bankruptcy by June 1, notified 1,124 of its 6,200 dealers that the automaker intends to end their franchise agreements by late next year.
Effect on the General Public
1,100 dealerships across the country will be closing by October, with another 1,500 by 2010. I know my blog is about the credit crisis and home ownership but honestly, let’s look at the big picture. The first entity affected is the owner of the dealership. Following them is all the closers, finance professionals, mechanics, salesmen, buyers, human resources, and customer service agents. That alone could mean loss of jobs for hundreds of people, in just one dealership. After you multiply that by the number of dealerships, you are barely scratching the surface as to how serious this really is.
Once the dealerships close down, there is no reason to keep as many plants open. Therefore, all of those people are losing their jobs as well. Companies that produce the components that are then provided to these plants to assemble the vehicles lose business and have to cut down as well. A high percentage of the people who have just been laid off have homes and mortgages, and now will be not only unable to make their payments on time but also suffer the impossibility of finding a new job.
I found an article specifically targeting this problem on CNNMoney, and it shows exactly the kind of mess we are in for. The truth is that before the financial crisis came upon us, we didn’t see unemployment as something that we could not avoid. I remember hearing men yell at veterans on the street to ‘Get a job, you bum!’ and never thinking twice that perhaps this man in fact could not get a job even if he wanted to.
In fact, the number of unemployed people in the country is staggering because many of these people filing for unemployment benefits for the very first time are either highly educated or have been in their field for decades. There are people out there who gave 25 years of their lives to one the so-called ‘Big Three’ and now have no where to go.
Pensions and Retirement
The fall of the American auto industry is also indicative of what has happened to many peoples’ life investments and retirement plans. During its heyday people sat pretty on a wonderful pension plan after retiring from one of these automotive giants. So here’s my next reference (also BW):
Today corporate pension funds are badly depleted, for the same reason that worker-managed 401(k) plans have suffered: The underlying securities took huge market losses in 2008. Benefits consultant Watson Wyatt (WW) calculates that the 100 largest pension plans are now $217 billion in the red, with enough assets to cover 79% of their long-term promises, down from an overfunding of 109% just one year earlier. Their investment loss: $300 billion.
I decided to research a little bit about how pension plans work for your benefit.
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is a federal corporation created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. It currently protects the pensions of nearly 44 million American workers and retirees in more than 29,000 private single-employer and multi-employer defined benefit pension plans. PBGC receives no funds from general tax revenues. Operations are financed by insurance premiums set by Congress and paid by sponsors of defined benefit plans, investment income, assets from pension plans trusteed by PBGC, and recoveries from the companies formerly responsible for the plans.
Basically that just means that in the event that these automakers crumble completely, this plan is in place to fund the pensions that remain. Due to the fact that this program is government funded as well, that is a very scary scenario. Where will these funds come from? And in the event that the PBGC does end up having to fund these pensions, chances are that the benefits will cut to accommodate, as much 25-29%. So far it does not look as though this will be necessary: YET, at least not with all companies. The Chrysler restructuring plan, which the United Auto Workers had helped to create, will remain in place and it is being presumed that the pensions will be transferred from the bankrupt company to the one that emerges, solvent, down the line. However, GM is teetering on the verge of perhaps the worst pension explosion in history, worse even than that of United Airlines which devastated the PBCG for almost 7.5 billion. The destruction of GM could leave the department liable for 13.5 billion, almost double that amount.
What About My Warranty!
Great Question, what about it? No I’m kidding. So far, from what I understand, the government had promised to back up all warranties so that consumers don’t shirk from purchasing a car from one of the affected companies. More information on warranties can be found here, however in addition to worrying about the warranties directly sold by the manufacturers, there is also the concern that dealership backed warranties are going under as well.
I hope my article was as informative to you as it was educational to me, I am amazed by the domino effect that this crisis is causing in our economy. I hope if you happen upon this article, you’ll put your two cents in.
Why do Loan Modification Companies exist?
Posted by Marcelo in Loan Modifications on May 16th, 2009

When I was in college I once bought some speakers. Not just any speakers. These speakers were supposedly water-cooled, lead cased monsters that could melt walls. I get very lucky as I was pulling out of a parking lot and a guy in a white van flagged me down. He said the bar that purchased them ordered too many and refused delivery. His boss ordered him to get rid of them as they didn’t have space. They could be mine for $300. Being a wise negotiator I told him $200 and he gave them to me for $225 begrudgingly. I commenced home to plug them in and play Nirvana so loud the house would shake.
The problem was they sounded bad even low and awful loud. I thought I must have had them hooked up incorrectly so I called a local speaker shop. After describing the speakers the salesman informed me that this brand was working the way they should. They were worth about $15 and were exclusively sold out of white vans. Opening the speakers to look at the water cooling mechanism confirmed these were cheap junk. I was scammed for the first time at the age of 18. It was humiliating. I was on the dean’s list at my university. I supposedly wasn’t dumb, just trusting. Well the $225 I spent that day, while a huge sum and represented my food for the month and it upsets me to this day, was well worth it. I have never been scammed again because I learned key points in identifying one.
The main trigger of this scam is that I was approached. I was not looking to purchase sound equipment. That means this predator got to me in a place of his choosing. I couldn’t look the brand up or ask someone else’s opinion. He also got me to believe something too good to be true. These speakers were supposedly worth thousands of dollars, the kind the astronauts have on the space station to jam out to during space walks. I needed to act quickly before someone else in the next town scoops them up and I only get to hear them at a few miles distance. He also got to hand pick me. I was a vulnerable kid who was just at the phase were I felt I should start to acquire nice things. He turned on the pressure and I thought it was my lucky day. I can look back and laugh at my stupidity now, but that day I thought the government should make the sale of stereo equipment illegal so that this would not have occurred.
Perhaps fittingly I have chosen to work in loss mitigation. One of the duties in this is to assist borrowers in obtaining loan modifications with their banks. Interestingly one of the questions we hear from prospective clients is “Is this a scam?” Why am I even being asked this? I work sometimes twelve hour days evaluating b0rrowers, assembling documents, calling lenders and filling out paperwork. There are people that have scammed homeowners, but how does that limit the need for what our company does? The other argument is that Homeowners don’t need representation, they can do it themselves. While this is entirely true, this is a terrible way to define something as a scam. Let’s look at some of the other things people can do for themselves:
1. Cut their hair – I don’t.
2. Change their own oil – I used to, don’t have time.
3. Grow their own food – I don’t have the space.
4. Trim their own trees – I don’t (I tried once, let’s just say i didn’t know I am afraid of heights and now I do)
5. Remodel the kitchen – if you do don’t get a permit. you will be trying to pass inspection for 3 years.
I could go on pretty much forever but you get the point. If we did all of these things we would never have time to work at our jobs and there is no one to hold accountable for the results.
Well, this morning I found a very well written article that clearly makes a distinction. It is the most intelligently written piece that I have seen on loan modifications in quite some time. I am happy that the Washington Post saw it fit to print. For information on the author please go to his web site.
It gets frustrating when someone contacts us for assistance and may qualify, but is later worried that they may be scammed. We have seen several homes go to auction that did not have to but the homeowner would not allow us to represent them. However, many do and we attain loan modifications for people every day. Thank you Professor Jack Guttentag for giving what we do a bit of recognition.
I suggest that if you are looking for assistance with a loan modification you take the example of a young me and his speakers. Make sure you do your research, don’t let someone solicit you, you solicit them. Don’t listen to someone who tells you things that seem to good to be true. Banks don’t just hand out floor rates and principle reduction because of the strength of your “negotiator.” Lawyers who claim to go after your lender for predatory lending based on an audit are selling a dream for profit.The only thing that will get you what you need is a consistent, sound loan modification done with integrity. Do your research and don’t be afraid to get representation if you are having difficulty.
Next time you go to your hair stylist, tell him that you think what he does is a scam because you can do it yourself. Bet you won’t get a good haircut! By the way, I now have a wonderful stereo system that I got off of the internet!





